Picture the séance. Two old dead men, propped up in a Pentagon briefing room to consult on a war neither lived to see. One of them keeps adjusting a tie for television cameras. The other keeps asking, with genuine irritation, why nobody has briefed him yet on the damned Soviets. This is not disrespect. This is simply what happens when a country keeps two dead men’s playbooks in active and never retired their numbers. Henry Kissinger, Carl von Clausewitz of our times, the self-styled Klemens von Metternich of the posh Foggy Bottom, forever composing the memoir in his head for his autobiography even while the crisis was still live; and on the other side of the ring Curtis LeMay, the cigar-chomping believer in the idea that any problem insufficiently solved simply hadn’t been bombed enough yet. An American Classic. The Super Bowl of warlords. Between them they represent the entire spectrum of American foreign policy, the bomb-interventionist and the nuclearbomb-interventionist.
LeMay’s contribution to strategic thought, was no more than shrug with ordnance attached: hit everything, hit it now, and stop asking the general to explain himself to people who have never dropped anything heavier than an objection. Simple, effective and old fashioned. He ran for vice president in 1968 on George Wallace’s ticket, because Nixon was too liberal for his taste, and torpedoed the campaign within days by cheerfully musing about nuclear weapons in a way that made even segregationists nervous. A man so committed to blunt force as a communication style that he couldn’t manage actual communication when it counted. He is remembered as the general who wanted to bomb his era’s inconveniences back through several geological epochs, an aesthetic more than a strategy, and on February 28th, 2026, Washington and Jerusalem finally let him have the pen for only an afternoon. Nearly nine hundred strikes in twelve hours. Missiles, air defenses, command infrastructure, and, in the opening minutes, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and his thirty-seven years of theocratic rule, terminated by what LeMay would have recognized instantly since nobody would have paused to explain satellite guidance and drones hybrid-war to a 121 years old man whose idea of precision was a bigger bomb dropped from a lower altitude to North Vietnamese schools.
It worked exactly as advertised and solved nothing, which is the part LeMay’s ghost would find genuinely perplexing. Within a week the Iranian Assembly of Experts, eighty-eight clerics doing the single most consequential HR decision in Iranian history. Mojtaba Khamenei as his father’s successor, which is the joke buried inside the whole affair: you can decapitate a man, but you cannot decapitate a dynasty, and theocracies, whatever else you say about them, have remarkably durable org charts. The war did not end. It spread into Lebanon, into the Strait of Hormuz, into an oil market that relearned an old lesson at significant expense. LeMay would have watched all of this, unbothered, and concluded only that the mistake was stopping the bombs, that the target list should simply have been longer, a diagnosis he would have delivered with total sincerity and zero interest in why the theory had just failed on live television.
Which left the room to the “immortal” Henry Kissinger, or rather to Kissinger’s understudies, since the man himself had been dead for over two years and available for consultation only in the loosest metaphysical sense. The actual living diplomats did their best impression of the mystique: twenty-one hours in Islamabad in April, JD Vance, who, like a good Catholic, would pray the night before to the spirit of Kissinger for sound diplomatic advice, across the table from parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, producing, after twenty-one hours, a very expensive nothing. This was Kissinger’s method with none of Kissinger’s supposed genius attached to it. The secrecy, the shuttle diplomacy, the sense of grave historical purpose, minus the part where any of it actually closed. Mathematical resoning. By June there was an “interim deal,” announced, then not announced, than rumored by Fox News, then disputed even by the people who had apparently just signed it, over a signing ceremony that kept sliding on the calendar like a wedding neither party was fully sure they wanted.
Neither man, revived only for this special occasion, would have found any of this surprising, and neither would have learned a single thing from it, because that is what it means to be a museum piece rather than a mind: LeMay would insist the strikes simply hadn’t gone far enough, Mojtaba should have been on the target list within the hour, the mistake was limited. Kissinger would insist that none of it had been necessary if his channel had been given more time and fewer deadlines, delivered in the tone of a man who has never once, in the historical record, conceded that a channel of his own design failed to produce anything either. Both would be describing, with total confidence, a war that five months in has produced a hardliner heir, a widened front in Lebanon, an (American) Strait that reopens and closes on nobody’s predictable schedule, and not one credible claim from Washington, Tehran, or Jerusalem that any of it was actually won.
Maybe the right ghost to resurrect was Dick Cheney
You must be logged in to post a comment.